“The decision to go for it on 4th down when a field goal was possible is the worst playcall I have ever seen in my life!” Expert Stephen A. Smith criticized the Denver Broncos after their painful loss to the Patriots at Empower Field at Mile High. Smith, known for his outspoken and often blunt commentary, didn’t hold back in his assessment of the Broncos’ decision-making in a pivotal moment of the game.

He argued that the choice to go for the 4th down instead of opting for the field goal was not just a questionable tactical decision but an outright reckless one. “This was an absolute blunder, a decision that cost the team a real shot at winning,” Smith continued, emphasizing how crucial that moment was in a game that was already hanging in the balance. In a game where every point counts, and the Patriots’ defense was already proving difficult to crack, Smith believed that opting for the field goal would have been the safer and more logical choice.
Smith’s criticism was rooted in his belief that the Broncos, who were trailing and desperately needed to make up ground, had failed to take the conservative, higher-percentage option that could have given them three much-needed points. Instead, the decision to gamble on 4th down left them with nothing after failing to convert, essentially handing the momentum back to the Patriots. This mistake, Smith argued, was a prime example of coaching decisions that can turn a game upside down.
“When you’re up against a team like the Patriots, you don’t take chances like that,” Smith said, referencing the Patriots’ long history of capitalizing on such opportunities. “You take the points, you take the field goal, and you live to fight another day. You don’t throw away your chances on a gamble that doesn’t make sense.”
Immediately following Smith’s comments, Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton responded strongly to the criticism. Payton, who had made the controversial call himself, fired back, defending his decision and challenging Smith’s assessment. “I trust my team, and I stand by that decision. We had a plan, and that was the right call for us in that moment,” Payton stated in his own media session. Payton, known for his confidence and assertiveness as a head coach, wasn’t about to back down from his call, regardless of the external criticism.

“Sometimes, you have to trust your players, and I believed that going for it would give us the best chance to score a touchdown, not just settle for a field goal,” Payton continued, explaining his rationale. He also pointed out that football is a game of risks, and in this case, he felt that the risk was worth the potential reward.
Payton’s response was direct, and he made it clear that he was fully committed to his decision, even if it was being scrutinized by the public and media. “I’ve made tough calls before, and I’ll make tough calls again. That’s what coaching is about,” he said, standing firm in his belief that his team’s potential to succeed in that situation outweighed the safe option. He also noted that the Broncos were not out of the game at that point and that the decision was not made lightly.
“We had our reasons for that call, and at the time, I believed it was our best option,” Payton concluded, showing no signs of regret or doubt about his approach. His willingness to defend his call in the face of public criticism only added fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the game.
The exchange between Payton and Smith quickly became a focal point of sports media coverage. As the days passed, fans and analysts alike weighed in on the controversy, offering differing opinions on the decision-making process. Some sided with Payton, appreciating his boldness and his unwavering belief in his team. Others, however, echoed Smith’s sentiments, believing that the safe, conventional choice would have been the better option, particularly when the game was so tightly contested.
The debate highlighted the fine line between confidence in one’s strategy and the harsh reality of high-stakes decision-making, where every choice can lead to either glory or failure.

For many, the focus on the 4th down decision overshadowed other aspects of the game, but the truth was that the Broncos had struggled in multiple areas, not just with the decision-making in critical moments. The offense had been inconsistent throughout the game, and the defense, while playing hard, was unable to stop the Patriots’ offense when it mattered most. The Patriots’ defense had done its job, shutting down the Broncos’ attempts at a comeback, and it was clear that the Broncos had a tough time establishing any sort of rhythm against New England’s disciplined play.
Despite the Broncos’ occasional flashes of brilliance, they were ultimately outmatched by a Patriots team that knew how to control the game and capitalize on every opportunity.
In the aftermath of the game, many turned their attention to the broader implications of the loss for the Broncos. The decision to go for it on 4th down was just one instance of the larger problems facing the team. The Broncos, under Payton’s leadership, were still in the midst of a rebuilding phase, attempting to regain their footing as a playoff contender. While Payton’s experience as a Super Bowl-winning coach gave hope to fans, the loss to the Patriots served as a reminder that there was still much work to be done.
The Broncos’ offense, despite some individual talent, was still far from being a well-oiled machine, and the lack of execution in crucial moments like the 4th down play was a sign of the team’s growing pains.
For Payton, the loss was a setback, but it wasn’t the end of the road. He understood that coaching in the NFL required learning from mistakes and adjusting accordingly. “We’re still building,” Payton said in a post-game interview, emphasizing the long-term vision for the team. “This season isn’t defined by one game. We’ll take the lessons from this game and move forward.” His confidence remained unwavering, as he continued to trust his players and his philosophy, understanding that consistency and perseverance would be key to eventual success.

Meanwhile, the Patriots, with their 10–7 victory, continued their march toward another potential Super Bowl appearance, with their defense and disciplined play serving as the backbone of their success. While the Broncos and Payton dealt with the fallout of their decision, the Patriots focused on what they had done right: controlling the game, making crucial stops, and capitalizing on the Broncos’ mistakes. For New England, the win was a step closer to reclaiming their place as one of the NFL’s elite teams.
For the Broncos, it was a harsh reminder of how quickly things could slip away in the NFL, especially when key decisions don’t go your way.
As the season progressed, both teams were forced to reflect on their performances. The Broncos had to deal with the fallout from the loss to the Patriots, analyzing what went wrong and how they could improve. Meanwhile, the Patriots were primed to take on their next challenge, with the confidence that their path to the Super Bowl was on track. The question of whether Payton’s 4th down call was the turning point of the game would linger in the minds of many, but ultimately, it was a small piece of a much larger puzzle for both teams.
As the season unfolded, both the Broncos and Patriots would look to build on their experiences, adjusting and refining their strategies for future success.