The buildup to Super Bowl LX has taken an unexpected and highly unusual turn, with Seattle Seahawks head coach Mike Macdonald publicly calling for the NFL to suspend New England Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs just days before the championship game. The demand has sparked widespread debate, turning what was already a highly anticipated rematch between the Seahawks and Patriots into something far more chaotic and circus-like.

Macdonald, in his second season leading the Seahawks after a successful stint as Baltimore’s defensive coordinator, has built a reputation for sharp, no-nonsense preparation and a relentless defensive scheme. His unit ranked among the league’s elite in 2025, finishing high in pressure rate and excelling against the run from two-high shells. Under his guidance, Seattle stormed to the NFC’s top seed with a strong record, powered by quarterback Sam Darnold’s resurgence and a physical, fast-flying defense that has carried them through the playoffs.

Now facing the Patriots in what marks a rematch of the iconic Super Bowl from over a decade ago, Macdonald has shifted focus away from Xs and Os to off-field matters. He specifically pointed to Diggs, the veteran wideout who signed with New England and helped propel them back to the Super Bowl for the first time since 2019.

Diggs, in his first season with the Patriots, posted solid numbers—around 1,000 receiving yards and multiple touchdowns—while forming a reliable target for quarterback Drake Maye. His journey to this point has been emotional; it’s his first Super Bowl appearance after years of close calls and setbacks, including an ACL tear.

However, Diggs has been embroiled in serious legal issues since late December 2025. He faces felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault and battery charges stemming from an alleged incident involving his former private chef. Diggs, through his attorney, has categorically denied the allegations, insisting the matter stems from a dispute that has been misrepresented.

The Patriots organization issued a statement supporting him while saying they are gathering information and cooperating with authorities and the NFL. Despite the charges, the league has not placed him on the Commissioner Exempt List or imposed any paid leave, especially after his arraignment was postponed until after the Super Bowl.

Macdonald’s call for suspension came during a media session amid Super Bowl week preparations in Las Vegas. He argued that the gravity of the charges—particularly one involving strangulation—warranted immediate action from the league to maintain the integrity of the game and protect the sport’s image at its biggest moment.

He reportedly described the situation as a distraction that could unfairly impact competitive balance, suggesting the NFL should err on the side of caution rather than allow a player facing such accusations to participate in the championship. The comments were blunt and direct, a departure from the typically measured tone coaches adopt during championship week.

The NFL responded firmly and swiftly, issuing a statement that emphasized its ongoing process for handling such matters. League officials reiterated that decisions regarding player status in legal cases are made after thorough review, including cooperation with law enforcement, input from the NFL Players Association, and consideration of due process.

They noted that no immediate suspension would be forthcoming ahead of the game, pointing to the postponed court date and the absence of a conviction or plea. The response underscored that the league takes allegations seriously but will not preemptively punish players based solely on charges without completed investigations or resolutions.

The exchange has ignited intense reactions across the football world. Critics of Macdonald accused him of gamesmanship, suggesting the demand was a strategic ploy to unsettle the Patriots’ preparation or draw attention away from his own team’s injury concerns, such as Darnold’s oblique issue.

Others defended him, arguing that domestic violence-related allegations demand zero tolerance, especially on the league’s grandest stage. Social media erupted with memes, hot takes, and debates, turning Super Bowl week into a spectacle far removed from typical storylines about matchups, keys to victory, or player motivation.

For the Patriots, the situation adds another layer of adversity. They have navigated distractions before, but having a key offensive weapon’s status questioned publicly creates uncertainty. Diggs himself has stayed relatively quiet on the matter during media availability, focusing instead on his excitement for the game and his determination to perform.

 He has previously addressed critics who labeled him “washed” after injuries, using strong words to reaffirm his confidence. His presence on the field could be pivotal; New England’s offense has relied on him in key moments, and facing Macdonald’s aggressive pressure package will test whether he can exploit single coverage or beat brackets.

Meanwhile, Seattle enters the game as a favorite in many projections, buoyed by their defensive prowess and home-field-like preparation mindset. Macdonald’s defense has consistently disrupted quarterbacks, and containing Maye—despite his shoulder concerns—will be central to their plan. Yet the off-field noise threatens to overshadow what should be a celebration of two strong teams meeting in a high-stakes rematch.

This entire episode highlights the delicate balance the NFL walks between competitive fairness, legal processes, and public perception. Macdonald’s bold demand and the league’s firm pushback have transformed Super Bowl LX preparations into something absurd and theatrical—a circus atmosphere where legal drama, coaching strategy, and championship stakes collide in unpredictable ways. Whether it affects on-field performance remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the spotlight has shifted dramatically, and the game itself now feels secondary to the surrounding chaos.

As kickoff approaches, both teams insist their focus remains on execution, adjustments, and winning the Lombardi Trophy. Diggs’ availability appears secure for now, but the controversy lingers, ensuring this Super Bowl will be remembered not just for what happens between the lines, but for the extraordinary off-field saga that preceded it. In a league where narratives often overshadow the sport, this one has reached new heights of unpredictability and spectacle.