Stop pairing him with us, you disgusting freak! – The transgender community protest against Lia Thomas, boycotting the cheating freak. Evidence proves that Thomas is still a man…
The controversy surrounding Lia Thomas, the biological male swimmer who entered women’s competitions, has erupted once again—this time not only from critics outside the LGBTQ+ world but from within the transgender community itself. Demonstrations have been breaking out, with many transgender activists taking to the streets and online platforms to distance themselves from Thomas, openly declaring that he does not represent them. Shouts of “Stop pairing him with us, you disgusting freak!” were heard as groups carried placards demanding the removal of Thomas from women’s sports altogether.
The backlash intensified after claims and evidence circulated showing that Thomas, despite medical transition attempts, still carries significant biological advantages as a male. Protesters argue that no matter how one identifies, biology cannot be ignored, especially in a competitive sports arena where fairness and equality are at stake. They say allowing Thomas to compete against biological women is not only unfair but also an insult to both female athletes and the transgender community that strives for acceptance based on truth, not deception.
Videos of protests show crowds chanting, waving rainbow flags but with slogans like “Thomas is not one of us” and “Cheating is not pride.” Many transgender activists expressed anger that Thomas has been used as a symbol in debates about trans inclusion in sports, claiming that his presence only fuels hatred and misunderstandings. “He is exploiting the label of trans for personal gain,” one protester shouted, while another stated, “Every time his name is mentioned, real trans people suffer the backlash. We refuse to be associated with his fraud.”
Online forums and social media posts add more fuel to the fire. Photos and reports highlight Thomas’s unchanged physical attributes—his height, skeletal structure, and muscle mass—that clearly give him advantages over biological women in swimming. Critics emphasize that even after hormone treatments, these structural male advantages do not disappear. Opponents argue that calling Thomas a “woman” in the competitive arena is nothing but a manipulation of language to cover blatant cheating.
Female athletes who once competed against Thomas have also stepped forward in solidarity with the protests. Several women have spoken of the demoralizing feeling of competing against someone with male physiology. Their testimonies add weight to the growing consensus that Thomas’s victories are neither legitimate nor fair.
The wider sports world is now forced to face this mounting pressure. Calls are growing for governing bodies to establish stricter guidelines based on biology rather than identity, ensuring that competition remains fair. Meanwhile, the transgender community continues to emphasize that rejecting Thomas is not about opposing transgender rights, but about rejecting fraud and misrepresentation.
As the protests spread, the message is becoming crystal clear: Lia Thomas is not a hero, not a pioneer, but a cheater hiding behind identity politics. The anger of the transgender community shows they are determined to protect their integrity by declaring that Thomas is still a man and will never be their representative.
